[Mo-facs] Mo-facs Digest, Vol 20, Issue 43

[Debbie Jackson]

Can I please have a copy on the baby project and the scoring rubric?  This
is my first year to do this project and I' not sure if I know what I' doing.
Thank you,
Debbie Jackson
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <mo-facs-request at lists.more.net>
To: <mo-facs at lists.more.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:00 PM
Subject: Mo-facs Digest, Vol 20, Issue 43


> Send Mo-facs mailing list submissions to
> mo-facs at lists.more.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.more.net/mailman/listinfo/mo-facs
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> mo-facs-request at lists.more.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> mo-facs-owner at lists.more.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Mo-facs digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Mean Girls Round Table (otto, mary)
>    2. list serve (carol phares)
>    3. Re: Baby Think It Over (Carla Sandwell)
>    4. Re: Baby Think It Over (Carla Sandwell)
>    5. career search (Christy Johnson)
>    6. Re: Mo-facs Digest, Vol 20, Issue 42 (Laurie Broy)
>    7. SBS (Charity Strauch)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 16:12:32 -0500
> From: "otto, mary" <motto at mail.camdenton.k12.mo.us>
> Subject: [Mo-facs] Mean Girls Round Table
> To: <Mo-facs at lists.more.net>
> Message-ID: <s51aa2fc.093 at mail.camdenton.k12.mo.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I misplaced the catalog of recommended books that I received at this
session at the July conference. Could the presenters of this session let me
know how I might obtain another copy? Thanks.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://lists.more.net/archives/mo-facs/attachments/20060927/31377249/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:22:25 +0000
> From: "carol phares" <cphares69 at hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Mo-facs] list serve
> To: Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> Message-ID: <BAY112-F37579474C6B842DDBCC7DEBE1A0 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>
> I just keep getting a summary each day with only 3-4 messages. How can I
get
> the entire list serve's messages from everyone? Like I used to.
> Carol Phares
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:33:28 -0500
> From: "Carla Sandwell" <fvmo at mchsi.com>
> Subject: Re: [Mo-facs] Baby Think It Over
> To: <mo-facs at lists.more.net>
> Message-ID: <011001c6e2a6$7b5c8fb0$6401a8c0 at DJGS3F41>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Question about the scorecard.
>
> Just curious...only 50 points out of 250 is deducted for Shaking a baby?
So
> you can still get a "B" on the project if you do everything else right and
> shake a baby?  Am I reading this right?
>
> Also, wanted to see if anyone has caught the episode of Suite Life with
Zach
> and Cody where London and Maddie did the Baby Think it Over project?  It
> aired a couple of weeks ago.
>
> Carla Sandwell
> Mom to Bennett (Shaken Baby Survivor dx 3/19/2000 at age 9 mos), Kiersty
and
> Jake!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mo-facs-bounces at lists.more.net
[mailto:mo-facs-bounces at lists.more.net]
> On Behalf Of Glasgow, Betty
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 7:37 AM
> To: Tricia Seibert; Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> Subject: Re: [Mo-facs] Baby Think It Over
>
> This is the scoreguide that I used with the Realcare babies.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mo-facs-bounces at lists.more.net
> [mailto:mo-facs-bounces at lists.more.net]On Behalf Of Tricia Seibert
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:39 AM
> To: Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> Subject: [Mo-facs] Baby Think It Over
>
>
> This is my first year using the Baby Think It Over parenting simulation.
>  I want to give the students a grade based on how they did, not just a
> participation grade.  I have the scoring guide that came with the
> simulation, but do not like the setup.  I would love to see any scoring
> guides that you have developed for this project.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Tricia Seibert
> FACS Teacher/ FCCLA Advisor
> Troy Buchanan High School
> 1190 Old Cap-au Gris Road
> Troy, MO 63379
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mo-facs mailing list
> Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> http://lists.more.net/mailman/listinfo/mo-facs
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:21:05 -0500
> From: "Carla Sandwell" <fvmo at mchsi.com>
> Subject: Re: [Mo-facs] Baby Think It Over
> To: "'Kristi Leal'" <lealk at carthage.k12.mo.us>
> Cc: mo-facs at lists.more.net
> Message-ID: <018001c6e300$f4034d00$6401a8c0 at DJGS3F41>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> If it were me, I would fail the student over shaking a baby or deduct 200
> points if you're using a 250 scale.  SBS is rated as the most serious form
> of child abuse.  And in many states it is now considered a felony.
Remember
> 1 out of 4 shaken babies die.
>
> You are all the educators, but in my opinion it sends out a lean message
> that you can shake a baby and have no consequences as the perpetrator.
> Remember, students who shake during these projects would also be
considered
> as perpetrators in real life and could potentially shake in real life.  I
> would not want my students to shake a baby and then say "Oh well, I got a
> "B" anyway."
>
> You know as a twist to the situation, a lesson plan could even be
developed
> that if you found one that had been shaken to go through the actual
> investigation process and do a mock trial with the class.  The jury could
be
> the perps peers.  You might even have a real life investigator or DA come
in
> and talk about it after the fact about the consequences.  I know you have
a
> lot to teach during the semesters but it is an idea.
>
> Just my opinions, and of course I'm biased as I know what happens in real
> life.  Thanks to all of you who have written me privately.
>
> Keep on Educating!
>
> Carla Sandwell
> Mom to Bennett (Shaken Baby Survivor dx 3/19/2000 at age 9 mos), Kiersty
and
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kristi Leal [mailto:lealk at carthage.k12.mo.us]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:02 AM
> To: fvmo at mchsi.com
> Subject: Re: [Mo-facs] Baby Think It Over
>
> Yes, 50 points for shaking a baby.
>
> I used the points that the lady sent out on her BTIO rubric. Last year,
> I only deducted 1 point for shaken baby and it was a 200 point project.
> This is my 2nd time doing the project, so, I'm modifying as I go. How
> many points would you deduct?
>
> <><
> Kristi Leal
> 9th Grade - Family & Consumer Science Teacher
> Carthage Jr. High School
> 827 East Centennial
> Carthage, MO 64836
> Phone 417 359 7050 ext 18106
> Website: http://www.carthage.k12.mo.us/~lealk/
>
>
> "Ours is not to do the extraordinary, only to do the ordinary,
> extraordinarily well." ~ Catherine McAuley
>
> >>> "Carla Sandwell" <fvmo at mchsi.com> 9/27/2006 9:33:28 PM >>>
> Question about the scorecard.
>
> Just curious...only 50 points out of 250 is deducted for Shaking a
> baby?  So
> you can still get a "B" on the project if you do everything else right
> and
> shake a baby?  Am I reading this right?
>
> Also, wanted to see if anyone has caught the episode of Suite Life with
> Zach
> and Cody where London and Maddie did the Baby Think it Over project?
> It
> aired a couple of weeks ago.
>
> Carla Sandwell
> Mom to Bennett (Shaken Baby Survivor dx 3/19/2000 at age 9 mos),
> Kiersty and
> Jake!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mo-facs-bounces at lists.more.net
> [mailto:mo-facs-bounces at lists.more.net]
> On Behalf Of Glasgow, Betty
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 7:37 AM
> To: Tricia Seibert; Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> Subject: Re: [Mo-facs] Baby Think It Over
>
> This is the scoreguide that I used with the Realcare babies.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mo-facs-bounces at lists.more.net
> [mailto:mo-facs-bounces at lists.more.net]On Behalf Of Tricia Seibert
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:39 AM
> To: Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> Subject: [Mo-facs] Baby Think It Over
>
>
> This is my first year using the Baby Think It Over parenting
> simulation.
>  I want to give the students a grade based on how they did, not just a
> participation grade.  I have the scoring guide that came with the
> simulation, but do not like the setup.  I would love to see any
> scoring
> guides that you have developed for this project.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Tricia Seibert
> FACS Teacher/ FCCLA Advisor
> Troy Buchanan High School
> 1190 Old Cap-au Gris Road
> Troy, MO 63379
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mo-facs mailing list
> Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> http://lists.more.net/mailman/listinfo/mo-facs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mo-facs mailing list
> Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> http://lists.more.net/mailman/listinfo/mo-facs
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Christy Johnson <momchristyj at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Mo-facs] career search
> To: mo-facs at lists.more.net
> Message-ID: <20060928145757.7500.qmail at web51407.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I would like to do a career/interest search on the internet for my high
school students...any suggestions?
>
>   Christy Johnson
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger?s low  PC-to-Phone call
rates.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://lists.more.net/archives/mo-facs/attachments/20060928/9093307f/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:12:46 -0500
> From: Laurie Broy <lbroy at wolves.k12.mo.us>
> Subject: Re: [Mo-facs] Mo-facs Digest, Vol 20, Issue 42
> To: mo-facs at lists.more.net
> Message-ID: <451BE66E.2020200 at wolves.k12.mo.us>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I need the region 10 president to email me information about the Silver
> Dollar City trip or if anyone knows her email could you please let me
know.
>
> Laurie Broy
> FCS teacher at Reeds Spring High School
> lbroy at wolves.k12.mo.us
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:38:43 -0500
> From: "Charity Strauch" <charity.strauch at maryville.k12.mo.us>
> Subject: [Mo-facs] SBS
> To: "FACS Server" <mo-facs at lists.more.net>
> Message-ID: <000a01c6e314$2e7aab00$0b0113ac at msd.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Since we are on the subject of skaken baby syndrome, I wanted to let
everyone know that there is an awesome, touching, and educational video
called Elijah's Story at the website http://www.dontshake.com/.  I ordered
this from them at a cheap price for a parenting module and balled my eyes
out.  I was so touched during the video that I stopped it and went in to my
5 month olds room to get her from her nap to have her in my arms.
>
> Charity Strauch
> charity.strauch at maryville.k12.mo.us
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
http://lists.more.net/archives/mo-facs/attachments/20060928/cedc8ab6/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mo-facs mailing list
> Mo-facs at lists.more.net
> http://lists.more.net/mailman/listinfo/mo-facs
>
>
> End of Mo-facs Digest, Vol 20, Issue 43
> ***************************************
>